- Dr. PriyaKrishnan
The
role of tourism and the establishment of tea and coffee estates are the major
causes that confront many of the archaeological remains in Yercaud. Some of the
most extensive dolmen sites to be identified by Robert Bruce Foote and his
successors in the picturesque hill had been almost razed to ground for the
development of tourist resorts cropped up in every nook and corner. The dolmen
site of Kilmondambadi (Foote 1916), cist burials of Karadiyur, Moganad (Foote
1916), Talaisolai and Sengadu irrespective of its antiquity had fallen as lame
victims to cater the needs of coffee estates. The presence of graves is seen at
these places only as a trash pits or as boundary stones planted in the estates.
The Neolithic implements identified at the site of Muluvi are also fast
disappearing due to the expansion of these
Earlier studies
on Neolithic and Iron Age Culture from Shervarayan Hills
Neolithic Culture
The credit for putting
Salem in the archaeological map of South India largely owe to a host of British
explorers during the pre-independence era. With its congenial geographical set
up, the
Salem region more
particularly the Shervarayan hills was identified as a potent area of research
for the antiquity of early mankind.
After the first
discovery of Palaeolithic implements in Pallavaram by Robert Bruce Foote, he
turned his attention towards this area in search of prehistoric settlements.
Foote however did not succeed in discovering any significant tool assemblages
from this place; instead he located few sites with Neolithic traits in the
Shervarayan hills. But even before Foote, it was Surgeon General Cornish who
could be credited for the discovery of Neolithic sites in Salem.
In the year 1864, Foote
made an extensive survey and sporadically found Neolithic implements from the
ploughed fields which were collected by the local while tilling the land. They
were subsequently housed in the small temples for worship. Later during the
course of his exploration in the Shervarayan hills, he came across the site of
Vattalmalai lying northwest of the hill. Apart from this site, other sites of
Neolithic period was centred on the northern part of the then undivided Salem
represented by the present districts Dharmapuri and Krishnagiri.
Along with these tools,
Foote also noticed some curious artefacts what he calls as the Ring stones and
Slick stones. He noticed that the ring stones are the common form found along
with Neolithic implements at this area. The next group of artefacts consist of
the representative specimens of stone artefacts like Phallus (?), Mullers and
Terracotta discs.
Other objects
such as the mullers and pottery discs are the commonest varieties found in
Neolithic settlements.
The descriptions of Foote also accounts for many significant observations upon
the availability and selection of raw materials by the Neolithic people of this
region.
Although much of Foote’s
work was based on surface findings, nevertheless his untiring efforts provided
stimulus to the pre-historic studies. His discoveries laid down firm foundation
to many of his successors to study the Neolithic culture in Tamil Nadu. On the
whole, the contribution made by Foote can be aptly called as the formative
phase of South Indian Archaeology in general and Neolithic in particular.
After the initiative
work of Foote we find considerable cessation of archaeological activities
pertaining to South India. No admirable survey was ever attempted and hardly
made any problem-oriented research towards the Neolithic remains. It was only
in post independence era that the research of Neolithic culture received fresh
impetus at the hands of B. Narasimhaiah of the Archaeological Survey of India
through his explorations. His intensive survey conducted over the northern
parts of Tamil Nadu brought to light concentration of sites atop the
Shervarayan as Kavalkaransamy.
No.
|
Site
|
DD_X
|
DD_Y
|
Taluk
|
Period
|
Type
|
Reference
|
|
1
|
Karadiyur
|
78.19778
|
11.84611
|
Yercaud
|
Iron Age
|
CC-U, Cist, Dolmen
|
Foote
1916: 61-62
|
|
2
|
Muluvi
|
78.20944
|
11.84889
|
Yercaud
|
Neolithic
period,
|
Celt,
CC-U
|
IAR 1962-63:13
|
|
Iron Age
|
||||||||
3
|
Senkadu
|
78.25417
|
11.80194
|
Yercaud
|
Iron Age
|
CC
|
Davood
2003
|
|
4
|
Talaisolai
|
78.26750
|
11.80139
|
Yercaud
|
Iron Age, Historical
|
CC,
Memorial stone
|
Davood
2003
|
|
period
|
||||||||
5
|
Semmamnattam
|
78.21483
|
11.86597
|
Yercaud
|
Neolithic period
|
Celt
|
-
|
|
Pudur
|
||||||||
6
|
Nadur
|
78.19361
|
11.81278
|
Yercaud
|
Neolithic
period,
|
Celt, Memorial
|
-
|
|
Historical
period
|
stone
|
|||||||
7
|
Velur
|
78.17456
|
11.81900
|
Yercaud
|
Neolithic
period
|
Celt
|
-
|
|
8
|
Poolakkadu
|
78.20889
|
11.86356
|
Yercaud
|
Neolithic
period
|
Celt
|
-
|
|
9
|
Servarayankovil
|
78.21675
|
11.80844
|
Yercaud
|
Iron Age
|
Dolmen
|
-
|
|
and Kalvarayan hills.
The site of Vattalmalai was reinvestigated and hundreds of polished Stone Axes,
worshipped as cult objects were found. Microlithic tools made on quartz and
chalcedony belonging to Late Stone Age were also reported to occur with the
stone axes (Narasimhaiah 1980: 31). His expedition too failed to produce any
noteworthy habitation area from the Neolithic period.
But the study of
Narasimhaiah made a positive approach and expanded the scope of Neolithic
archaeology of Salem region. Meanwhile the same period witnessed addition of
few isolated finds by the Department of Ancient History and Archaeology,
University of Madras at the site of
Muluvi near
Yercaud in Shervarayan hills (IAR 1962-63: 13).
Iron Age Culture
The documentation of
Megalithic remains in Salem region was initiated by Robert Bruce Foote.
Irrespective of his interest over Palaeolithic remains, his descriptions about
the
Megalithic monuments are
still valid for their accuracy. He identified that the western and northern
parts of Shervarayan hills were rich in dolmens. While assessing the
archaeological wealth of Salem region, Foote contents to draw that Shervarayan
hill possessed with more Iron Age reserves than the Neolithic age (Foote 1916:
61). His explorations were chiefly concentrated on the western and the northern
part of the Shervarayan hills. They were found to be rich in dolmens. A group
of three sites namely Kilmondampadi, Karadiyur and Moganad were investigated by
him. But his description over the opening the group of burials at Kilmondampadi
are quite vague to understand weather he really goes to describe dolmens.
In the year 1875 Justice
M.J. Walhouse made several additions by discovering a number of sites
containing dolmens and cist burials at Shervarayan hills. From his accounts one
could observe that many of the burials had subsidiary cists around the main chambers
(Walhouse 1875). The government of India in the year 1882 appointed Robert
Sewell to compile the antiquarian remains throughout Tamil Nadu. Consequent to
his visits to Dharmapuri and Salem numerous sites were newly identified and
added in his volume (Sewell 1882).
Evidence of
Neoliths from Shervarayan Hills
From this region
majority of the cultural material from Neolithic period are polished stone axes
and these axes at Shervarayan hills were collected by the local people from the
nearby stream and cultivated field as Samikkal (god stone) and placed them in a
small temple called Pillaiyarkoyil in every village. Though the tradition is of
recent years, the location and typological aspects of these tools within the
landscape suggest that these tools belongs to Neolithic Age but this aspect is
yet to be confirmed with concrete Neolithic habitation sites.
Muluvi
(11°51’05.4” N; 078°12’16.5” E)
The village Muluvi lies
14 km north of Yercaud on the Shervarayan hills in district Salemt. Neolithic
implements like hand axes and polished stone tools are found in the
Pillaiyarkovil (Ganesh temple) constructed on the northern side of the
Mariyammankovil. The polished tools are measuring 5 to 18 cm in length and 4.5
to 7 cm in breadth. Thirty Five polished tools are found under the tree (fig.
22). It is locally called as Samikkal. Nearly Eleven grooves used for polishing
the edges of the Neolithic tools are noticed on the bedrock located in front of
the Mariyammankovil (fig. 23). These shallow troughs look alike to the shallow
trough used for manufacturing the Polished Stone Axe during Neolithic times.
Such shallow grooves were reported earlier at Sangnakallu-Kupagal in district
Bellary of Karnataka and recently reported at Keezanur on the Javadi hills (The
Hindu, 2013:20) in district Vellore of Tamil Nadu
Semmamnattam
Pudur (11°50’39.5” N; 078°12’53.4”)
The village Semmamnattam
Pudur is located about 17 km north of Yercaud on the Shervarayan hills. A small
temple built of four slabs looking like a dolmen known as Maniyappankoyil is
noticed at the northern side of the village. A polished stone tool measuring 8
cm in length placed inside the temple and there tool is called as Samikkal.
Velur
(11°49’08.4” N; 078°10’28.4”)
The village Velur lies 12 km west of Yercaud on the
Shervarayan hills. Neolithic implements like hand axes and polished stone tools
are found in the Pillaiyarkovil (Ganesha temple) on the southern side of the
village and Ramarkovil on the eastern side of the village.
The polished tools are measuring 4 to 15 cm. About
fifty polished tools are found in the Pillaiyarkovil and four polished tools
are found in the
Ramarkovil
It is locally called as Samikkal.
Nadur
(11°48’46.0” N; 078°10’28.4” E)
Nadur lies 9 km west of the Yercaud on the
Shervarayan hills. A small temple built of four slabs looking like a dolmen
known as Pillaiyarkoyil (Ganesha temple) is noticed at the northern side
of the
Mariyammankovil in centre of the village. More than ten polished stone tools
measuring 7 to 14 cm in length placed inside the temple and these tools are
called as Samikkal (fig. 26).
There are three late medieval period memorial stones
found on the northern side of the Mariyammankovil locally known
Poolakkadu
(11°51’48.8” N; 078°12’32.0” E)
The small village
Poolakkadu is located 15 km north of the village Yercaud on the Shervarayan
hills. Neolithic implements like hand axes and polished stone tools are found
in front of the Mariyammankovil constructed on the western side of the village.
The polished tools are measuring 7 to 14 cm in length and 4 to 7 cm in breath.
Four polished tools are found under the tree. It is locally called as Samikkal.
Iron Age - Early
Historic Sites
Previously four Iron Age
sites reported and during the present survey two more Iron Age burial sites
were located in the Yearcaud on the Shervarayan hills. A brief description of
the sites is given below.
Muluvi
(11°51’05.4” N; 078°12’16.5” E)
The terracotta figurine
collected by R.B. Foote from the site of Muluvi is one of the rarest finds
found in this region from Iron Age site (Foote 1916: 62). It’s rudimentary form
and heavy hair style dressed in short ringlets around the head leads us to
assume its age dating back to Megalithic times. Iron Age Urn burials are
reported by Department of Ancient History and Archaeology, University of Madras
(IAR
1962-63: 13).
Karadiyur
(11°50’39.5” N; 078°12’01.4” E)
Karadiyur lies 14 km
northwest of the Yercaud on the Shervarayan hills. Iron Age cist burial and urn
burial were noticed by Robert Bruce Foote (Foote 1916).
Iron Age dolmens are
found during the present exploration on eastern side of the village. There are
two dolmens are found in the coffee estate. Instead of slabs, chamber walls
were made of small rubble placed in 3 to 5 courses to the height of 50-60 cm.
The whole structure or chamber is surrounded with two circles. The inner circle
had slabs placed at regular intervals around the capstone except on the eastern
side. It is locally known as Pandiyanveedu. The dolmen measures to 3 to 5 m in
height and the circle is raised 1 m from the surface. The cairn circle was
built of boulders kept at regular intervals.
Servarayan Kovil
(11°48’30.4” N; 078°13’00.3” E)
The temple Servarayan Kovil lies 7 km north of Yercaud on the Shervarayan hills. Iron Age dolmens are found a km away from temple and the place is called Paaikadu. More than twenty dolmens are found on the rocky surface locally known as Pandiyanveedu. Dolmens made of four dressed orthostats enclosed with flat capstone are found in the present stone quarry area. The dolmen measured 5 m to 7 and the chamber is 2.5x1.0x0.30. The circle is raised 1 m from the rocky surface. The cairn circle was built of boulders kept at regular intervals.
The temple Servarayan Kovil lies 7 km north of Yercaud on the Shervarayan hills. Iron Age dolmens are found a km away from temple and the place is called Paaikadu. More than twenty dolmens are found on the rocky surface locally known as Pandiyanveedu. Dolmens made of four dressed orthostats enclosed with flat capstone are found in the present stone quarry area. The dolmen measured 5 m to 7 and the chamber is 2.5x1.0x0.30. The circle is raised 1 m from the rocky surface. The cairn circle was built of boulders kept at regular intervals.
Discussions
The modern
surveys reveal that the Shervarayan hills are rich in archaeological remains.
The
Neolithic sites
have been identified mainly in the hilly area of the Shervarayan hills. But no
Neolithic settlements
like habitation and potteries have been reported in these hills so for,
although polished stone axes and grooves have been found in this hill.
Identification of the
Iron Age - Early Historic burial sites exist in this region. The hilly areas
have been met with dolmens, stone circles, cist burials and cairn circles. They
are buried near the rivulet. The dolmens are known as Pandiyan-Veedu. The cairn
circles are known as Pandiyan thittu and Pandiyan-Veedu.
However, lack of
excavation prevented our understanding on the nature of cultural developments
in this eco-zone. Well planned and problem-oriented excavations in future alone
could solve the research problems related to the megalithic burials.
References
Foote, R.B. (1916) Pre
Historic And Proto Historic Antiquities of India, Leladevi
Publications, Delhi.
(IAR) Indian Archaeology –
A Review 1961-62, Archaeological Survey of India, New Delhi.
(IAR) Indian Archaeology – A Review 1962-63, Archaeological
Survey of India, New Delhi. Phillips,
Rev. Maurice (1873) Tumuli in the Salem District, Indian Antiquary
(2).
Narasimhaiah,
B. (1980) Neolithic and Megalithic Culture in Tamil Nadu, Sundeep
Prakashan, New Delhi.
Rajannan,
Busnagi (1992) Salem Cyclopaedia: A Cultural and Historical Dictionary of
Salem District, Tamil Nadu, Institute of Kongu Society, Salem.
Sewell,
Robert (1882) List of Antiquarian Remains in Presidency of Madras,
Archaeological Survey of India, Madras.
Walhouse,
M.J. (1875) Notes on the Megalithic Monuments in the Coimbatore District, Journal
of Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, New Series
(7).
About the
author
Dr priyakrishnan is
working as an Assistant Professor in Department of Tamil, Chennai. Her areas of interest are pre-history and historical period.
(Article Courtesy :
Heritage and Us - Year 2, Issue 4,
Dec 2013/Jan 2014 ISSN 2319-1201 / © Heritage Conservators, New
Delhi, 2012)